Up up and away
An Helium baloon is put in the back of an empty Transit van.
The balloon is tied to the centre of the floor with a light cord.
As the van accelerates what happens to the balloon.
When the van turns what does the balloon do
And therefore what happens as the van slows down.
Posted: 25/02/2005 15:39:13 By: Slimcea |
Nothing Nothing nothing!
Posted: 25/02/2005 15:41:07 By: Man Friday |
The gimps are taking over the asylum
Posted: 25/02/2005 15:49:33 By: Doc |
Helium balloon in a Transit. The balloon remains in the centre lane totally immune to everything around that is hoping to go faster - this is how helium became known as an inert gas
Posted: 25/02/2005 16:09:06 By: Friday and fed up |
It's not necessarily what the helium does but what is done to it. Cause and effect - helium may be inert and/or apathetic but it isn't immovable.
Posted: 25/02/2005 16:22:41 By: Steve Fossett |
I think Newton's laws of motion would apply however my First in Physics was 37 years ago! It was at Newtons College (Trinity - Cambridge.) though!
Posted: 25/02/2005 17:19:34 By: Harold G Twincy |
the helium balloon moves in the opposite direction to what you think. ie when braking forwards etc
Posted: 25/02/2005 18:18:59 By: cambridge entrance test |
Generally, as the hellium ballon has a mass Newtons laws will apply, until the transit van reaches near light speed.
Posted: 25/02/2005 18:21:04 By: Alan Fuller |
Clearly a WHITE van then
Posted: 25/02/2005 19:00:33 By: WVM |
This is basic mechanics/physics
Simplify the problem - the helium has mass - so effect same as hanging a box from the van roof by a string.
Movement will tend to be forward on braking, back on accelerating. Not much movememnt though as the balloon contents less dense than surrounding air (air provided dampening)
Quad errat demonstratum
Posted: 26/02/2005 10:20:31 By: gas man |
drove off the road this morning 'cause i was watching the balloon - it moved!
Posted: 26/02/2005 10:41:04 By: white van man |
you guys need to get out more
Posted: 26/02/2005 14:11:11 By: lala |
When the van starts, any mass is thrown to the back. The mass in this case is the air in the van not the balloon, the helium baloon is displaced FORWARDS. Similarly the baloon will go backwards when you brake and to the inside of any bend.
Don't you Merlin sailors have anything better to talk about?
Posted: 26/02/2005 18:33:22 By: Lark Sailor with A level Physics |
Funny things Larks - they get lift when there is none.
Sure it was A level Physics, and not A Level Mystics. For air to move in relation to you, you either have to move through it [you are not doing that sat in a van] or they has to be pressure difference [non in van] so air does not move around.
Baloon will obey Newtons Laws.
Posted: 26/02/2005 20:17:02 By: Physics Master |
is that where 'up with the lark' comes from? obviously you lark chaps can have no better read than the MR website!
Posted: 27/02/2005 11:14:59 By: wvm |
Right, I've had a Grolsch or two so here goes.
The balloon will obviously want to stay put but there will be a pull from the string downwards and progressivly more forwards upon it. This will make it follow the van in going forwards as the upward pull of the balloons bouyancy reacts against the down and forward pull of the string causing the ballon to rise and move forward in relation to the van. As the upward bouyancy of the balloon matches and becomes greater than the downward pull exerted by the string, the balloon will "catch up" with the van and, assuming the van reaches a constant velocity, the string will become vertical.
As for wind resistance, anybody who has done any physics will know that "igoring wind resistance" was simply omitted from the question and was intended to be there.
Posted: 27/02/2005 19:16:39 By: Cant explain himself |
PS, Lark idiot - how is it "thrown to the back"?
Posted: 27/02/2005 19:17:17 By: Cant explain himself |
It's all relative you see.
Posted: 27/02/2005 19:20:35 By: WVM |
cant explain himself; are you inert? 'cause the balloon is !
oh, and lark sailors are very nice people.
Posted: 28/02/2005 08:22:52 By: the real wvm |
I think the A-level Physics Lark sailor got it, bless his/her pimpled chin.
As the van accelerates all the mass within the van (including the balloon and the air around it) will have to be accelerated. As the air in the van is denser than the helium it will be tend to move towards the back of the van and the helium balloon will be pushed forward. It would work the same way as a centrifuge ,i.e. spin something very fast and all the dense material would move to the outside of the circle it prescribes.
Posted: 28/02/2005 09:38:34 By: Navy Blue |
inertia - all matter in the van will react in the same way from the point of combustion onwards.
Posted: 28/02/2005 09:42:05 By: john |
Does hot air come into this?
Posted: 28/02/2005 11:22:51 By: WVM |
'spin something very fast and all the dense material would move to the outside of the circle it prescribes' - does this explain why I am thrown into the gunwhale when attempting a quick tack???????
Posted: 28/02/2005 17:03:02 By: Scotty |
No: that's a function of the intake of alchohol the night before!
Posted: 28/02/2005 17:34:47 By: WVM |
What about the apparent wind - surely as the van moves off the apparent wind will increase and excerpt a force on the surface area of the balloon thus the balloon move towards the back of the van - the faster the van goes the more the force on the balloons surface - soon the balloon will be streaming horizontally on its string - then corners really wont matter!
Posted: 01/03/2005 09:37:17 By: Less Physics - more sailing! |
Flatulance?
Posted: 01/03/2005 10:36:02 By: WVM |
apparent wind only comes into play if you leave the side door open
Posted: 01/03/2005 10:41:13 By: john |
Essential if flatulence a factor too.
Posted: 01/03/2005 12:04:36 By: WVM |
Better out than in!!!
Posted: 01/03/2005 13:09:49 By: Less Physics - more sailing! |
The Lark sailor is indeed correct.
For the same reason that it wants to float upwards (Archimedes principle) it will be displaced forward on acceleration and backwards on braking.
Posted: 01/03/2005 13:12:21 By: Slimcea |
Come one you guys! Gas man got it right. The ballon has mass, the helium merely exerts an upward force. Wind velocity is nil unless the window is open. The string will cause the mass of the ballon to lag behind the forces applied, just as Newton said. The ballon will lean to the rear on acceleration and to the outside of the corner on turning. Stick to sailing! On a different topic, a snail was gliding down a street, minding his own business when he was viciously attacked and robbed by a couple of slugs who left him lying unconcious in a pool of slime. When he came round, he saw a bobby standing over him. "What happened to you little fella?" enquired the bobby. The snail told his story and the bobby said "can you describe your assailants? I might be able to catch them" The snail replied "Sorry officer, it all happend too quickly"..
Posted: 12/04/2005 01:24:43 By: Bill Hall |
Surprised to see this float to the top again.
Of course Newton's law applies and indeed the balloon does have mass. We're not discussing gravity but buoyancy; The balloon is less dense than the surrounding air. Thus, Bill Hall's interpretation of string theory is misguided.
Posted: 12/04/2005 18:20:21 By: Slimcea |
This question is very similar to the "why did I drink so much last night" question. Profoundly important to understand, but quite irrelevant in the circumstance.
Posted: 12/04/2005 18:32:50 By: Interested Observer... |
Come on, I'm waiting for someone to drag poor old Coriolis out for this one !
Posted: 12/04/2005 20:15:21 By: John Dalby |
Okay, here's my two cents...uhm...pence. We're not talking bouyancy or gravity, but momentum. Mass in motion tends to stay in motion, mass at rest tends to stay at rest. The balloon and the gas within it both have mass, and consequently have momentum. When the van is at rest, the balloon is at rest. When the van begins to move, the balloon stays at rest until the air in the van (which also stays at rest temporarily) moves or the string tightens, then moving the balloon. I'm guessing forward motion of the van results in higher pressure at the back of the van, which equalizes once the van stops accelerating. When that equalizes, the balloon also becomes stationary relative to the van, even though the van is moving forward. When the van turns, the balloon keeps travelling tangent to that curve...until the string or the air or both pull it along with the van. So really, the motion of the balloon is no different than that of a tethered ball in the back of the van, except that its mass is so low that the air itself has a noticeable effect on its movement.
Can't believe I just typed that...
Posted: 12/04/2005 21:28:46 By: Rob Berger |
If you are a true transport operative you do not care what the cargo suffers.
Posted: 12/04/2005 22:00:43 By: Nigel |
I concure with Nigel!
Posted: 13/04/2005 11:46:43 By: WVM |
He has hit the nail squarely on the head....!!
Posted: 13/04/2005 12:29:47 By: Interested Observer... |
Well i think the majority of us agree on the correct physics to use. String Theory of T Theory, I guess only applies if travelling faster than speed of light.
If we're bring in Coriolis, which hemisphere is the van travelling in?
Posted: 13/04/2005 17:04:30 By: Gas Man |
The Coriolis Force Since the globe is rotating, any movement on the Northern hemisphere is diverted to the right, if we look at it from our own position on the ground. (In the southern hemisphere it is bent to the left). This apparent bending force is known as the Coriolis force. (Named after the French mathematician Gustave Gaspard Coriolis 1792-1843). It may not be obvious to you that a particle moving on the northern hemisphere will be bending towards the right.
Posted: 13/04/2005 21:22:49 By: For the avoidance of doubt |